RRM JOURNAL CLUB

Recurrent pregnancy loss: what is the impact of consecutive versus non-consecutive losses?1

 

P EgerupA M KolteE C LarsenM KrogH S NielsenO B Christiansen

doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew169  | Author, Article, and Disclosure Information [Link out to publisher's website]

Facilitated by Dr. Joseph Stanford, for this month's journal club we discuss a study by Egerup et. al., "Recurrent pregnancy loss: what is the impact of consecutive versus non-consecutive losses?

The IIRRM Journal Club provides a critical appraisal of published research relevant to the field of Restorative Reproductive Medicine, and are designed to increase providers’ competence to critically evaluate research by increasing their knowledge of the scientific method, research design, and common biases.  Members are encouraged to download the article and work through the handout alongside the recording while viewing this presentation.

IIRRM Journal Club series offers 75 minutes in self-study cme through our website (approved for 1.25 prescribed AAFP credit, classified as "endured content").

Attended this webinar live?  Please complete this survey to request CME.

 

About the Speaker

 

Joseph Stanford, MD, MSPH, is the Director of the Office of Cooperative Reproductive Health and Professor in the Department of Family Preventive Medicine, at the University of Utah in Salt Lake City. He has authored or co-authored numerous articles concerning pregnancy, prenatal care, natural family planning, fertility, and related topics.  His research has been funded by the NICHD, the CDC, and several private foundations.  Dr. Stanford is actively involved in many professional associations, including the Society for Pediatric and Perinatal Epidemiologic Research, the AAFCP, and the IIRRM.  He has served on national scientific advisory committees for the NICHD and the FDA in the USA.

Joe e1546274658767

Source Citation

 

1 Egerup P, Kolte AM, Larsen EC, Krog M, Nielsen HS, Christiansen OB. Recurrent pregnancy loss: what is the impact of consecutive versus non-consecutive losses?. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(11):2428-2434. doi:10.1093/humrep/dew169